ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Predictors of Complete Oral Intake in Patients With Stroke After Tracheostomy.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on rehabilitation programs for dysphagia in patients with ischemic stroke: A Narrative review.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheostomy procedures inhibit swallowing, although details of subsequent recovery of oral intake remain unknown. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate factors influencing dysphagia improvement in patients with subacute stroke after tracheostomy. METHODS AND
resultsThe study included 117 patients who underwent tracheostomy after subacute stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, or endogenous subarachnoid hemorrhage and received care at 2 convalescent rehabilitation wards in urban and suburban Japan between 2015 and 2022. The primary outcome measure was the achievement of complete oral intake. Patient demographics, Functional Independence Measure scores, body mass index, food intake level scale scores, and the presence of severe white matter hyperintensities on imaging were retrospectively collected from medical records. Statistical analysis involved univariate logistic regression to identify potential predictors and multivariate logistic regression to refine the model while accounting for multicollinearity. In total, 47% of patients achieved complete oral intake on discharge. Sex, days from onset to admission, Functional Independence Measure motor and cognitive scores, body mass index, food intake level scale scores, and severe white matter hyperintensities were identified as potential predictors in the univariate analysis. However, multivariate logistic regression identified only food intake level scale scores (odds ratio [OR], 3.687 [95% CI, 1.519-8.949];
conclusionsIn patients with subacute stroke undergoing tracheostomy, the level of oral intake on admission and severe white matter hyperintensities on imaging may be better predictors of complete oral intake. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes and more comprehensive data are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.