ArticleOncology letters2024
Initial clinical experience with durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real‑world practice.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Comparison of First-Line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab and Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Liver Transplantation Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: What Do We Need to Know from Clinical and Immunological Perspective?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reproducible safety and efficacy of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab for hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: Results of the DT-real study.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Sequential Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Impact of Child Pugh B Stage for the Treatment of Advanced HCC.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Multicenter Observational Study.Oncology research · 2026Observational
- First-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab or durvalumab/tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a real world, multicenter retrospective study.The oncologist · 2025Article
- The benefit of conversion therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab using newly established oncological resectability criteria in Japan.Hepatology international · 2025Article
- Article
- Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly and adolescent/young adult populations.Journal of liver cancer · 2025Article
- A real-world drug safety surveillance study from the FAERS database of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Initial treatment efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) has been approved as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), its outcomes in real-world clinical practice are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dur/Tre treatment. This multicenter study was conducted between March 2023 and January 2024, and included 120 patients with u-HCC treated with Dur/Tre. Among the patients, 44 had no history of systemic treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), therapeutic response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 15.8 and 53.3%, respectively. The median PFS was 3.9 months. The incidence rates of AEs of any grade and those grade 3 or higher were 83.3 and 36.7%, respectively. Liver injury was the most frequent AE of any grade and grade 3 or higher. Although there was no significant difference in ORR and PFS between the first and later line groups (ORR 15.8 vs. 15.7%, P=0.986; PFS 4.5 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.213), there was a significant difference in DCR between the two groups (65.8 vs. 45.9%, P=0.034). No significant differences were noted between the first- and later-line treatment groups regarding the incidence rate of AEs. Decision tree analysis revealed that poor liver function and advanced age were significant variables for discontinuation owing to AEs. In conclusion, Dur/Tre as first-line therapy had better disease control responses compared with later-line therapy; however, this regimen should be carefully administered to patients with deteriorating hepatic function or advanced age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.