Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38979482›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

Youth attention, perceptions, and appeal in response to e-cigarette advertising features: A focus group study.

Michelle Jeong, Caitlin Weiger, Caitlin Uriarte, Olivia A Wackowski, Cristine D Delnevo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle JeongRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street Suite 500, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Caitlin WeigerRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street Suite 500, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Caitlin UriarteRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street Suite 500, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Olivia A WackowskiRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street Suite 500, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, 303 George Street Suite 500, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

The Impact of E-cigarette Marketing Features on Youths' E-cigarette Perceptions and Use IntentionsK01CA242591 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JEONG, MICHELLE · 2019 to 2023
$964k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA242591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: E-cigarette marketing exposure may influence vaping-related outcomes among youth, but less is known on which specific advertising features impact youth attention, perceptions, and appeal. This study qualitatively examines responses to different e-cigarette advertising features among e-cigarette-naïve youth. Methods: We conducted four online focus groups in 2021 with a national U.S. sample of 13-17 year olds (n = 25) who had never used e-cigarettes. Participants viewed and discussed their reactions to different e-cigarette advertisements varying in the inclusion of ad features, including color, models in imagery, text claims targeting smokers, and the nicotine warning label. Results: Participants were attracted to ads with bright colors, particularly when contrasted against a dark background. Ads featuring models attracted attention and reduced perceptions that the product is harmful. Comments indicated mixed reactions to smoker-targeted text claims. On one hand, participants perceived ads with text that specified "for smokers" as targeting older adults. On the other hand, text referring to "switching" from cigarettes to e-cigarettes led to some perceptions that the product is healthy, and certain text that implicitly referred to smoking (e.g., "no odor") had the potential to appeal to youth who wanted to use e-cigarettes discreetly. The level of attention paid to warnings depended on warning size and the color contrast between the warning and the rest of the ad. Conclusions: Findings suggest specific e-cigarette ad features play an important role in attracting youth attention and influencing perceptions. More research is needed on the potential public health benefits versus unintended consequences of smoker-targeted text claims.

Indexed as

Ad featuresE-cigarettesFocus groupMarketingQualitativeYouth

Identifiers

PMID38979482
PMCPMC11228789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.