Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38979007›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Yan-Da Li, Jiří Kolibáč, Zhen-Hua Liu, Adam Ślipiński, Shûhei Yamamoto, Ya-Li Yu, Wei-Ting Zhang, Chen-Yang Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yan-Da LiState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-202X
Jiří KolibáčDepartment of Entomology Moravian Museum Brno Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-7084
Zhen-Hua LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology Guangdong Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-3305
Adam ŚlipińskiAustralian National Insect Collection CSIRO Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-8068
Shûhei YamamotoHokkaido University Museum Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-8457
Ya-Li YuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology Guangdong Academy of Sciences Guangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-1637
Wei-Ting ZhangInstitute of Paleontology Hebei GEO University Shijiazhuang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-1748
Chen-Yang CaiState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-8323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beetles have a remote evolutionary history dating back to the Carboniferous, with Mesozoic fossils playing a pivotal role in elucidating the early evolution of extant families. Despite their exceptional preservation in amber, deciphering the systematic positions of Mesozoic trogossitid-like beetles remains challenging. Here, we describe and illustrate a new trogossitid-like lineage from mid-Cretaceous Kachin amber,

Indexed as

CleroideaCretaceousfossilKachin amberparsimonyphylogenetic analysis

Identifiers

PMID38979007
PMCPMC11229430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.