ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Sputum Bacteriological Profile of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections With Bartlett Score Analysis in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern Karnataka.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bacterial profile, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and associated factors among lower respiratory tract infection patients attending at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest, Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Navigating an evolving microbial landscape: emerging antimicrobial resistance trends and precision stewardship in Tianjin tertiary hospitals (2021-2023).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are one of the most commonly encountered infections with significant mortality and morbidity. Sputum is the most frequently obtained sample for LRTI diagnosis. However, sputum samples carry the risk of being non-representative due to the risk of contamination with oral colonizers. To overcome the dilemma with respect to representative sampling, the use of a scoring system such as the Bartlett scoring system is emphasized. This study probes the bacterial profile of sputum samples among patients presenting with LRTIs and their antibiotic susceptibility profile in relation to the Bartlett scoring system. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective data for a period of three years, comprising 4960 sputum samples from patients presenting with LRTI, were collected to study the bacterial profile and antibiogram in comparison with the sputum quality analyzed by the Bartlett scoring system.
resultsOut of the 4960 sputum samples analyzed from patients with LRTI, 31.18% yielded the growth of bacterial pathogens, and 98.64% of the sputum samples yielding pathogenic growth had a significant Bartlett score.
conclusionSputum samples are non-invasive representative samples of lower airway infective pathologies. Sputum quality assessment by Bartlett scoring serves as a proxy marker to rule out respiratory colonization and aid culture-based diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.