ReviewCureus2024
The Feasibility of Elimination of Monkeypox Virus in Nigeria: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox is a zoonotic virus with an increasing incidence in Nigeria, posing significant public health challenges. The virus, related to smallpox, primarily spreads through direct contact with infected animals or humans and has been noted for its potential for wider transmission due to changing ecological and social dynamics. This research aims to evaluate the feasibility of eliminating monkeypox in Nigeria through integrated approaches involving vaccination, public health strategies, and ecological management. Additionally, it seeks to propose a unified public health strategy, incorporating One Health principles, to achieve the elimination of monkeypox in Nigeria. A review of the feasibility of eliminating the monkeypox virus in Nigeria was conducted using databases like Science Direct, Cochrane, PubMed, and Medline. The search was guided by the methodologies and reporting guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The initial search yielded 89 publications, but the number of articles that required examination was reduced after applying selected keywords and evaluating abstracts. We deemed 32 articles relevant to the subject after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings are analyzed, highlighting their limitations and strengths and discussing practical implications, knowledge gaps, and recommendations for future research. This study provides evidence supporting the feasibility of the elimination of the monkeypox virus in Nigeria. Strategic recommendations for a sustainable public health approach to eliminating monkeypox emphasize preventive measures, community engagement, and ecological preservation. This study will provide critical insights into the feasibility of eliminating monkeypox in Nigeria, offering a model that can be adapted for other regions facing similar challenges. The integration of health, ecological, and community-focused strategies is expected to contribute significantly to global efforts to control and potentially eradicate monkeypox. This research could serve as a foundational study for public health authorities in Nigeria and internationally, informing policy and operational decisions to control and eliminate monkeypox as a public health threat. The monkeypox virus reemerges in Nigeria, increasing mortality rates. Awareness programs should be conducted on its danger, transmission mode, and potential human transmission. Public education on the lack of treatment and vaccines is crucial. Meat inspection laws should be enforced to ensure safe animal consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.