ReviewActa medica Lituanic2024
A Systematic Review about Cervical Pregnancy and our Experience.
Review in Acta medica Lituanic, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical and Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in One Patient: A Sequential Case with Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of direct surgical management for early-stage cervical pregnancy: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in Rare and Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Uterine artery embolization with or without methotrexate followed by D&C versus D&C alone for cervical pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- From Suspicion to Confirmation: An Original Study on a Complete Diagnostic Pathway for Ectopic Pregnancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and management of cervical pregnancy with placental implantation: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Review
- Current Trends in the Treatment of Cervical Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Minimizing Hemorrhage Risk Strategies in Cervical Pregnancy-Stepwise Pharmacologic Priming and Delayed Surgical Evacuation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cervical Ectopic Pregnancies-Imaging and Endovascular Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Rare Clinical Conundrum: Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy in the Presence of a Large Cervical Fibroid.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical ectopic pregnancy is a relatively rare type of ectopic pregnancy and has no standardized guidelines for management. Methods: This systematic review is based on the collection of case reports, published in PubMed/MEDLINE about the resolution of ectopic cervical pregnancies over the last decade and the presentation of a case managed in our healthcare unit. Studies involving cervical pregnancy in the first trimester with the presence of a viable embryo and β-hCG in the serum below 100.000 mIU/mL were included, while heterotopic pregnancies were excluded. Results: Nineteen articles reporting twenty-three case reports are demonstrated explicitly emphasizing on the management techniques. There is no established approach for the management of this type of ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion: It is important to consider the conservative approaches as first-line treatment in all cases of cervical pregnancy preserving fertility. Minimally invasive methods are also described and preferred as second-line treatment, as reported in our literature review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.