Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978812›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Time from injury to acute surgery for patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in South-East Norway.

Mads Aarhus, Jalal Mirzamohammadi, Pål Andre Rønning, Mona Strøm, Thomas Glott, Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi, Donata Biernat, Håvard Ølstørn, Pål Nicolay Fougner Rydning, Vidar Tveit Vasfaret Stenset and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Management of traumatic spinal cord injury in the Nordic countries: a multidisciplinary survey.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mads AarhusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jalal MirzamohammadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Andre RønningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mona StrømSpinal Unit, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.
Thomas GlottSpinal Unit, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.
Syed Ali Mujtaba RizviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Donata BiernatDepartment of Neuroradiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard ØlstørnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Nicolay Fougner RydningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Vidar Tveit Vasfaret StensetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Aksel NæssInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christine GaarderInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tor BrommelandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hege LinnerudDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik HelsethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The recommended treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) is surgical decompression and stabilization within 24 h after injury. The aims of the study were to estimate our institutional compliance with this recommendation and identify potential factors associated with surgical delay. Methods: Population-based retrospective database study of patients operated for cSCI in 2015-2022 within the South-East Norway Health Region (3.1 million inhabitants). Data extracted were demographics, injury description, management timeline, place of primary triage [local hospital (LH) or neurotrauma center (NTC)]. Main outcome variables were: (1) time from injury to surgery at NTC, (2) time from injury to admission NTC, and (3) time from admission NTC to surgery. Results: We found 243 cSCI patients having acute neck surgery. Their median age was 63 years (IQR 47-74 years), 77% were male, 48% were ≥65 years old. Primary triage at an LH occurred in 150/243 (62%). The median time from injury to acute surgery was 27.8 h (IQR 15.4-61.9 h), and 47% had surgery within 24 h. The median time from injury to NTC admission was 5.6 h (IQR 1.9-19.4 h), and 67% of the patients were admitted to the NTC within 12 h. Significant factors associated with increased time from injury to NTC admission were transfer via LH, severe preinjury comorbidities, less severe cSCI, time of injury other than night, absence of multiple injuries. The median time from NTC admission to surgery was 16.7 h (IQR 9.5-31.0 h), and 70% had surgery within 24 h. Significant factors associated with increased time from NTC admission to surgery were increasing age and non-translational injury morphology. Conclusion: Less than half of the patients with cSCI were operated on within the recommended 24 h time frame after injury. To increase the fraction of early surgery, we suggest the following: (1) patients with clinical suspicion of cSCI should be transported directly to the NTC from the scene of the accident, (2) MRI should be performed only at the NTC, (3) at the NTC, surgery should commence on the same calendar day as arrival or as the first operation the following day.

Indexed as

cervical spinal cord injuryimprovement of careneurotraumapatient transfertiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID38978812
PMCPMC11228170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.