Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Clinical meaningfulness and psychometric robustness of the MG Symptoms PRO scales in clinical trials in adults with myasthenia gravis.

Antoine Regnault, Ali A Habib, Kristin Creel, Henry J Kaminski, Thomas Morel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03971422 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Rozanolixizumab in Adult Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB Biopharma SRLRan2019 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsGeneralized Myasthenia GravisArmsRozanolixizumab, Placebo
NCT07033559 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Remote Digital Voice Biomarkers for Central Fatigue Detection in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: An Online Single-Cohort Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorThymia LimitedRan2026 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsMyasthenia Gravis Generalised
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoine RegnaultModus Outcomes, A Division of THREAD, Lyon, France.
Ali A HabibMDA ALS and Neuromuscular Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States.
Kristin CreelModus Outcomes, A Division of THREAD, Lyon, France.
Henry J KaminskiDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Thomas MorelUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this research was to generate psychometric evidence supporting the myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms patient-reported outcome (PRO) scales as a fit-for-purpose measure of severity of core symptoms of MG and provide information allowing their meaningful interpretation using data from a phase 3 study in MG. Methods: Data from the MycarinG study, a phase 3 study of rozanolixizumab in patients with generalized MG who experience moderate to severe symptoms (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03971422) were analyzed with both classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement theory (RMT). Meaningful within-individual change and group-level meaningful change were estimated for three MG Symptoms PRO scales using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Anchor-based methods used patient global impression of severity (PGIS) and change (PGIC) in MG symptoms as anchors. Results: Good measurement properties of the MG Symptoms PRO scales were shown in the sample of 200 participants: good to excellent reliability (test-retest and internal consistency reliability) and validity (associations between items and scores within the MG Symptoms PRO scales and between the MG Symptoms PRO scores and other clinical outcomes-MG ADL, QMG score, MGC score, and MGFA classes-were as expected); and the items showed good coverage of the continuum and fit to the Rasch model. Triangulation of the anchor- and distribution-based method results led to the definition of clinically meaningful within-patient improvement in scores for Muscle Weakness Fatigability (-16.67), Physical Fatigue (-20.00), and Bulbar Muscle Weakness (-20.00), with associated ranges. Benchmarks are also proposed for the interpretation of group-level results. Conclusion: The strong psychometric performance of the MG Symptoms PRO scales and the information generated to guide its interpretation supports its use in clinical trials for demonstrating the clinical benefits of new treatments targeting core symptoms of MG (muscle weakness fatigability, physical fatigue, bulbar muscle weakness, respiratory muscle weakness, and ocular muscle weakness).

Indexed as

clinically meaningful changefatiguemuscle weaknessmyasthenia gravis (MG)patient reported outcomes (PRO)psychometric analysis

Identifiers

PMID38978809
PMCPMC11229520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.