Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978711›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Standardizing Generalist Definitions to Improve Evidence in General Medicine: Addressing Diverse Interpretations and Lack of Consistency.

Risa Hirata, Masaki Tago, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Risa HirataDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-5252
Masaki TagoDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1092-1834
Kiyoshi ShikinoDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-3443
Takashi WatariIntegrated Clinical Education Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9322-8455
Hiromizu TakahashiDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke SasakiDepartment of General Medicine and Emergency Care, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-4875
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-487X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There has been growing interest in generalists in Japan in recent years. However, due to the diverse use of the term "generalist", the specific roles of these physicians remain ambiguous. Consequently, the target population for research on generalists is unclear, making it challenging to conduct studies within the generalist practice framework. Therefore, a literature search was conducted to examine how generalists are defined and classified in research worldwide. Methods: We conducted a literature search that focused exclusively on articles written in English and used keywords related to generalists, general medicine (GM), primary care, and family medicine. Based on the results, six physicians working in GM reviewed the findings and discussed the identified issues and their potential solutions. Results: The definition of generalists in studies targeting GM, family medicine, and primary care conducted worldwide, including Japan, varies. Generalists exhibit diverse roles even within university hospitals in Japan. No studies provide a precise categorization or definition of generalists based on specific medical practices or roles, except for hospitalists, who are primarily involved in inpatient management in the United States. Conclusion: The definition of GM was unclear based on the results of the literature search, and the lack of uniformity in backgrounds has rendered the target population unclear. Consequently, in healthcare settings where medical systems vary by country or region, evidence from studies targeting generalists cannot readily apply to actual practice. Clarifying generalists through an explicit definition based on clinical practice will allow for a more precise target population for research on generalists and enable the accumulation of evidence related to well-defined groups of generalists, contributing to the advancement of GM. Therefore, future research is required to develop new indicators to precisely classify and define generalists.

Indexed as

definitiongeneralistgeneral medicinehospitalist

Identifiers

PMID38978711
PMCPMC11228072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.