ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2024
A personalized prognostic model for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of survival outcomes and prognostic factors between intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection: a propensity score-matched study based on the SEER database.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Combined CA19-9, CA125, and CEA to predict prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after radical surgery: a retrospective, multi-institutional study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the optimal cutoff points for age and tumor size of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and to establish and verify a predictive nomogram of overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. Methods: From the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database, 1,325 ICC patients were selected and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Using the X-tile software, age and tumor size were classified into 3 subgroups: ≤61, 62-74, and ≥75 years and ≤35, 36-55, and ≥56 mm. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using the R software in the training cohort to determine independent risk factors, compile the prediction nomogram, and verify it with the testing cohort findings. Results: The C-indexes of the new prediction nomograms in the training and testing cohorts were 0.738 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.718-0.758) and 0.750 (95% CI, 0.72-0.78), respectively. Furthermore, the areas under the 1-, 3-, and 5-year receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves based on the nomogram were 0.792, 0.853, and 0.838, respectively, higher than the ROC based on the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Cancer Commission (AJCC) staging system. Conclusion: This study established and verified a prognostic nomogram that improved the accuracy of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival predictions for ICC patients, compared with that based on the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system, and can help clinicians make personalized survival predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.