ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Effect of herpes zoster vaccination on dementia occurrence: A quasi-experimental study in Australia.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Taking advantage of a natural experiment in Wales, our group has recently provided evidence that herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination appears to prevent or delay dementia. Exploiting a similar natural experiment in Australia, this present study investigated the effect of HZ vaccination on dementia occurrence in a different population and health system setting. Objective: To determine the effect of HZ vaccination on the probability of receiving a new diagnosis of dementia in the future. Design Setting and Participants: In Australia, starting on November 1 2016, live-attenuated HZ vaccination was provided for free to individuals aged 70 to 79 years of age through primary care providers. Thus, those whose 80 Exposure: Eligibility for HZ vaccination based on one's date of birth. Main outcome: New diagnoses of dementia as recorded in primary care electronic health record data. Results: As expected, in our sample of 101,219 patients, individuals born just before versus shortly after the date-of-birth eligibility threshold (November 2 1936) for HZ vaccination were well-balanced in their past preventive health services uptake and chronic disease diagnoses. There was an abrupt increase of 16.4 (95% CI: [13.2 - 19.5], p < 0.001) percentage points in the probability of ever receiving HZ vaccination between patients born shortly before versus shortly after the date-of-birth eligibility threshold. The eligibility rules of the HZ vaccination program, thus, created comparison groups just on either side of the date-of-birth eligibility threshold who were likely similar to each other, except for a large difference in their probability of receiving the intervention (HZ vaccination) of interest. Drawing on a sample of 18,402 patients, we find that eligibility for HZ vaccination (i.e., being born shortly after versus shortly before November 2 1936) decreased the probability of receiving a new dementia diagnosis over 7.4 years by 1.8 percentage points (95% CI: [0.4 - 3.3], p = 0.013). Being eligible for HZ vaccination did not affect the probability of taking up other preventive health services (including other vaccinations), nor the probability of being diagnosed with other common chronic conditions than dementia. Conclusions and Relevance: Corroborating our quasi-experimental findings from Wales in a different population, this study provides important evidence on the potential benefits of HZ vaccination for dementia because its quasi-experimental design allows for conclusions that are more likely to be causal than those of more commonly conducted associational studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.