Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978647›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Exploiting multivariate network meta-analysis: A calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood inference.

Yifei Wang, Lifeng Lin, Yu-Lun Liu

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifei WangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Southern Methodist University, 3225 Daniel Ave, Dallas, TX 75205, USA.
Lifeng LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Yu-Lun LiuPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 77039, USA.

Funding

Novel evidence-accumulation-driven methods for characterizing kidney stone progressionR01DK128237 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, YU-LUN · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool in evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which potentially lead to misleading conclusions. In this paper, we proposed a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminated the need to specify a full likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yielded unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal level. Furthermore, we implemented the proposed method on two real-world network meta-analysis datasets; one comparing treatment procedures for the root coverage and another comparing treatments for anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients.

Indexed as

Bayesian composite likelihoodGibbs samplingMultivariate network meta-analysisOpen-Faced Sandwich adjustmentUnknown within-study correlations

Identifiers

PMID38978647
PMCPMC11230323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.