Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978606›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Universal Full-Day Kindergarten and Maternal Labor Supply: A Life-Cycle Analysis.

Ashley Erceg, Katie Genadek, Kristine West

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley ErcegCenter for Economic Studies, United States Census Bureau.
Katie GenadekContact Author: University of Colorado - Boulder, IZA; Institute of Behavioral Science, UCB 483, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 80309-0401.
Kristine WestSt. Catherine University; 2004 Randolph Ave, St Paul, MN, USA 55105.

Funding

Microdata for Population Dynamics and Health ResearchR01HD043392 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Sarah M Flood, Steve Ruggles · 2002 to 2026
$14.8M
Integrating, Preserving, and Disseminating Linked CPS DataR01HD067258 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Julia AR Drew, Sarah M Flood · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Spatial Analysis CoreR24HD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI RUGGLES, STEVE · 2001 to 2016
$4.1M
The University of Colorado Population CenterR24HD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI PAMPEL, FRED C · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043392NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067258NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD066613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimate the effect of state-level policies enacting universal free full-day kindergarten on mothers' labor supply using a life-cycle analysis. Similar to previous research on childcare and labor supply, we find that free full-day kindergarten increases labor force participation rates for mothers whose youngest child is kindergarten-aged by 4.3 to 7.1 percentage points. We find that for mothers whose youngest child is an infant, labor force participation increases by 7.2 to 9.8 percentage points, and for women whose youngest child is 3 to 4 years old labor force participation increases by 5.9 to 7.9 percentage points. The fact that the policies impact the labor supply for mothers of younger-than-kindergarten-age children by even more than for mothers of kindergarten-aged children is important for understanding the full effect of subsidized childcare. This is consistent with a life-cycle model of labor supply where wages and prices in future periods impact mothers' labor force attachment.

Indexed as

childcare subsidiesI2J13J18J20J30labor supplymotherspublic schooling

Identifiers

PMID38978606
PMCPMC11230515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.