ArticleAging & mental health2024
Using choice modelling to inform service sustainability for dementia Meeting Centres for people living with dementia in the UK.
Article in Aging & mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Preferences for Dementia Interventions: A Scoping Review With a Systematic Review of Medications and Choice-Based Methods.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study explores the preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) of carers for Meeting Centres (MCs) attributes in assisting individuals with mild to moderate dementia.
methodPreferences from 108 carers, gathered through UK-wide MC networks, were collected using a Discrete Choice Experiment survey. The survey incorporated attributes derived from evidence synthesis and lay consultation. A regression model estimated preference weights and marginal WTP for a change in attributes one a time within the MC support 'package.'
resultsCarers preferred MCs offering a balanced mix of practical activities and emotional support, along with flexibility without booking requirements and low costs. Social opportunities and the frequency of the meeting were not prioritised. Respondents expressed a WTP of £43 to stay with 'My MC,' the preferred option, compared to transitioning to an alternative in-person MC, all else being equal. Various factors, including attendance modality, the relationship with the supported person, age, and gender, influenced carers' choices.
conclusionThese findings offer valuable insights into carers' preferences, priorities, and WTP within MC support for those with mild to moderate dementia. Understanding these factors can guide the implementation and sustainability of MCs, ensuring alignment with carers' needs and preferences and, ultimately, enhancing support for individuals with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.