Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978347›Full record

ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2024

Study on botulinum toxin in dermatology from 2000 to 2023: A CiteSpace-based bibliometric analyses.

Ziwenyan Zhou, Fujun Huang, Jin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziwenyan ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, the First Affilated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fujun HuangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-4310
Jin ChenDepartment of Dermatology, the First Affilated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing bibliometric methods, this study analyzed and summarized the current situation and development of the global application of botulinum toxin in dermatology.

methodsLiterature published in the Web of Science Core Collection database from January 1, 2000 to October 28, 2023 was searched for topics such as "Botulinum toxin," "Dermatology," and so forth. The number of publications, countries, institutions, journals, authors, cited literature, keywords, and so forth, were analyzed and a visual knowledge map was created using scientometric tools such as CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica.

resultsA total of 2039 documents were retrieved and 1877 documents were included after de-duplication and transformation. The country with the highest number of published periodical articles was the United States; the main research institution was Yonsei University; the author with the highest number of published periodical articles was Kim, Hee Jin; and the high-frequency keywords mainly related to indications, combination therapy, and safety optimization.

conclusionThe results of this study provide information on the current status and trends in clinical studies of botulinum toxin in dermatology, which will help researchers identify hotspots and explore new research directions in this field.

Indexed as

BibliometricsDermatologyBotulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type ACosmetic TechniquesHumansNeuromuscular AgentsPeriodicals as TopicSkin DiseasesBotulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsbibliometric analysisbotulinum toxinCiteSpacedermatologyVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID38978347
PMCPMC13649095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.