Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978135›Full record

ArticleMedical education2025

Feedback, learning and becoming: Narratives of feedback in complex performance challenges.

Margaret Bearman, Mary Dracup, Rola Ajjawi, Catherine Kirby, James Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feedback with feelings: the human complexity of expressing judgements about performance.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margaret BearmanCentre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-9871
Mary DracupCentre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-4145
Rola AjjawiCentre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0651-3870
Catherine KirbySexual Health Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James BrownSexual Health Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-1629

Funding

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners ERG022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBecoming a general practitioner (or family medicine specialist) is challenging, as trainees learn to manage complex and ambiguous situations. Feedback is a key component of this learning. Although research has tended to focus on feedback's momentary processes and impacts, there is value in seeking to understand the work it does over time and how trainees position themselves across multiple feedback encounters. We ask: how do newly qualified GPs narrate themselves and their experiences with complex performance challenges? Within these narratives, what is the role of feedback?

methodsThe research adopts a holistic and sequential narrative analysis approach, with in-depth narrative interviews of 16 general practice trainees who had just completed their training requirements. The analysis involved restorying the participant narratives chronologically. Each narrative formed a unit of analysis where narrative commonalities across plots, characters, emotions and the role of feedback were interpreted.

resultsFour plotlines within GP trainees' stories of complex performance challenges were identified: Journeyperson, Hero's Quest, Solo Journeyer and Endless Struggle. Trainees, supervisors and feedback are positioned differently within these plotlines. Narratives were saturated with emotions. DISCUSSION: The plotlines bring together an alternative way of understanding how feedback, learning and becoming are woven together. They illustrate how multiple interactions with patients, supervisors, peers and systems thread together into an overall trajectory. How a trainee positions themselves as protagonists and who they characterise as their antagonists can help direct the focus of supervisors' feedback conversations.

Indexed as

FeedbackLearningNarrationClinical CompetenceFemaleFormative FeedbackGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38978135
PMCPMC11708812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.