Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38978057›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

Value-based preoperative assessment in a large academic hospital.

Maurizio Cecconi, Giulia Goretti, Andrea Pradella, Patrizia Meroni, Martina Pisarra, Guido Torzilli, Marco Montorsi, Antonino Spinelli, Alessandro Zerbi, Carlo Castoro and 17 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Considerations for Care of the Cancer Patient.International anesthesiology clinics · 2025
    Article
  4. Correction: Value-based preoperative assessment in a large academic hospital.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. maurizio.cecconi@hunimed.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4376-6538
Giulia GorettiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea PradellaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia MeroniIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Martina PisarraIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Guido TorzilliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Marco MontorsiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Antonino SpinelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro ZerbiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Carlo CastoroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Paolo CasaleDepartment of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Efrem CiviliniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio QuagliuoloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Marco KlingerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe SprianoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Domenico VitobelloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Leonardo MaradeiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Bernhard ReimersDepartment of Cardiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Federico PiccioniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Rosaria MartucciDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Niccolò StomeoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Elena VanniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Marco BabbiniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Roberta MonzaniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CapogrecoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Michele LagioiaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Massimiliano GrecoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValue-based healthcare (VBHC) is an approach that focuses on delivering the highest possible value for patients while driving cost efficiency in health services. It emphasizes improving patient outcomes and experiences while optimizing the use of resources, shifting the healthcare system's focus from the volume of services to the value delivered. Our study assessed the effectiveness of implementing a VBHC-principled, tailored preoperative evaluation in enhancing patient care and outcomes, as well as reducing healthcare costs.

methodsWe employed a quality improvement, before-and-after approach to assessing the effects of implementing VBHC strategies on the restructuring of the preoperative evaluation clinics at Humanitas Research Hospital. The intervention introduced a VBHC-tailored risk matrix during the postintervention phase (year 2021), and the results were compared with those of the preintervention phase (2019). The primary study outcome was the difference in the number of preoperative tests and visits at baseline and after the VBHC approach. Secondary outcomes were patient outcomes and costs.

resultsA total of 9722 patients were included: 5242 during 2019 (baseline) and 4,480 during 2021 (VBHC approach). The median age of the population was 63 (IQR 51-72), 23% of patients were classified as ASA 3 and 4, and 26.8% (2,955 cases) were day surgery cases. We found a considerable decrease in the number of preoperative tests ordered for each patient [6.2 (2.5) vs 5.3 (2.6) tests, p < 0.001]. The number of preoperative chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, and cardiac exams decreased significantly with VBHC. The length of the preoperative evaluation was significantly shorter with VBHC [373 (136) vs 290 (157) min, p < 0.001]. Cost analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in costs, while there was no difference in clinical outcomes.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a tailored approach for preoperative evaluation. The implementation of VBHC enhanced value, as evidenced by decreased patient time in preoperative evaluation and by a reduction in unnecessary preoperative tests.

Indexed as

OutcomesPatient-centred carePatient empowermentPreoperative assessmentPreoperative evaluationQualityRiskSurgeryValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38978057
PMCPMC11232329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.