ArticleBMC women's health2024
Prediction of precancerous cervical cancer lesions among women living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: a comparison of supervised machine learning algorithms.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predicting cervical cancer among women living with HIV/AIDS at public health facilities in a resource-limited setting in Ethiopia using machine learning analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Federated Learning Performance Depends on Site Variation in Global HIV Data Consortia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for cervical cancer: existing AI approaches and the emerging role of vaginal microbiome.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in HIV research: a structured review and task-oriented clinical framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Prevalence, high-risk HPV type profile, and factors associated with high-risk HPV infection among women living with HIV in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Developing multimodal cervical cancer risk assessment and prediction model based on LMIC hospital patient card sheets and histopathological images.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- AI Methods Tailored to Influenza, RSV, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2: A Focused Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI applications in HIV research: advances and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is among the most prevalent cancer types among women with the highest prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is a curable disease if detected early. Machine learning (ML) techniques can aid in early detection and prediction thus reducing screening and treatment costs. This study focused on women living with HIV (WLHIV) in Uganda. Its aim was to identify the best predictors of CC and the supervised ML model that best predicts CC among WLHIV.
methodsSecondary data that included 3025 women from three health facilities in central Uganda was used. A multivariate binary logistic regression and recursive feature elimination with random forest (RFERF) were used to identify the best predictors. Five models; logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), K-Nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) were applied to identify the out-performer. The confusion matrix and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/ROC) were used to evaluate the models.
resultsThe results revealed that duration on antiretroviral therapy (ART), WHO clinical stage, TPT status, Viral load status, and family planning were commonly selected by the two techniques and thus highly significant in CC prediction. The RF from the RFERF-selected features outperformed other models with the highest scores of 90% accuracy and 0.901 AUC.
conclusionEarly identification of CC and knowledge of the risk factors could help control the disease. The RF outperformed other models applied regardless of the selection technique used. Future research can be expanded to include ART-naïve women in predicting CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.