ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
MR-CT image fusion method of intracranial tumors based on Res2Net.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformation complementarity can be achieved by fusing MR and CT images, and fusion images have abundant soft tissue and bone information, facilitating accurate auxiliary diagnosis and tumor target delineation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to construct high-quality fusion images based on the MR and CT images of intracranial tumors by using the Residual-Residual Network (Res2Net) method.
methodsThis paper proposes an MR and CT image fusion method based on Res2Net. The method comprises three components: feature extractor, fusion layer, and reconstructor. The feature extractor utilizes the Res2Net framework to extract multiscale features from source images. The fusion layer incorporates a fusion strategy based on spatial mean attention, adaptively adjusting fusion weights for feature maps at each position to preserve fine details from the source images. Finally, fused features are input into the feature reconstructor to reconstruct a fused image.
resultsQualitative results indicate that the proposed fusion method exhibits clear boundary contours and accurate localization of tumor regions. Quantitative results show that the method achieves average gradient, spatial frequency, entropy, and visual information fidelity for fusion metrics of 4.6771, 13.2055, 1.8663, and 0.5176, respectively. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method preserves more texture details and structural information in fused images than advanced fusion algorithms, reducing spectral artifacts and information loss and performing better in terms of visual quality and objective metrics.
conclusionThe proposed method effectively combines MR and CT image information, allowing the precise localization of tumor region boundaries, assisting clinicians in clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.