ArticleScientific reports2024
Noninvasive, label-free image approaches to predict multimodal molecular markers in pluripotency assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Innovations for Quality Control and Standardization: Future Strategies in Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Manufacturing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Metabolic Regulation in the Maintenance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manufacturing regenerative medicine requires continuous monitoring of pluripotent cell culture and quality assessment while eliminating cell destruction and contaminants. In this study, we employed a novel method to monitor the pluripotency of stem cells through image analysis, avoiding the traditionally used invasive procedures. This approach employs machine learning algorithms to analyze stem cell images to predict the expression of pluripotency markers, such as OCT4 and NANOG, without physically interacting with or harming cells. We cultured induced pluripotent stem cells under various conditions to induce different pluripotent states and imaged the cells using bright-field microscopy. Pluripotency states of induced pluripotent stem cells were assessed using invasive methods, including qPCR, immunostaining, flow cytometry, and RNA sequencing. Unsupervised and semi-supervised learning models were applied to evaluate the results and accurately predict the pluripotency of the cells using only image analysis. Our approach directly links images to invasive assessment results, making the analysis of cell labeling and annotation of cells in images by experts dispensable. This core achievement not only contributes for safer and more reliable stem cell research but also opens new avenues for real-time monitoring and quality control in regenerative medicine manufacturing. Our research fills an important gap in the field by providing a viable, noninvasive alternative to traditional invasive methods for assessing pluripotency. This innovation is expected to make a significant contribution to improving regenerative medicine manufacturing because it will enable a more detailed and feasible understanding of cellular status during the manufacturing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.