Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977780›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predictive modeling of lower extreme deep vein thrombosis following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: based on multiple machine learning methods.

Haiyan Zhou, Yongyan Jin, Guofeng Chen, Xiaoli Jin, Jian Chen, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haiyan ZhouNursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.
Yongyan JinNursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.
Guofeng ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoli JinDepartment of Gastroenterology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China. zrchenjian@zju.edu.cn.
Jun WangDepartment of Gastroenterology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China. wangjunoscar@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Clinical Research Fund of Zhejiang Medical Association 2021ZYC-A68Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2022KY790Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2022RC165National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203452Teaching Reform Research and Cultivation Project of the Second Clinical School of Medicine, Zhejiang University 20220103Zhejiang Province Co-construction Project WKJ-ZJ-2310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), such as lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), are major risk factors for gastric cancer (GC) patients following radical gastrectomy. Accurately predicting and managing these risks is crucial for optimal patient care. This retrospective case‒control study involved 693 GC patients from our hospital who underwent radical gastrectomy. We collected plentiful and comprehensive clinical indicators including a total of 49 baseline, preoperative, surgical and pathological clinical data. Using univariate logistic regression, we identified potential risk factors, followed by feature selection through the Boruta algorithm. We then constructed the final predictive model using multivariate logistic regression and evaluated it using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, decision curve analysis, and other methods. Additionally, we applied various machine learning techniques, including decision trees and random forests, to assess our model's predictive strength. This retrospective case‒control study involved 693 GC patients from our hospital who underwent radical gastrectomy. We collected plentiful and comprehensive clinical indicators including a total of 49 baseline, preoperative, surgical and pathological clinical data. Using univariate logistic regression, we identified potential risk factors, followed by feature selection through the Boruta algorithm. We then constructed the final predictive model using multivariate logistic regression and evaluated it using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, decision curve analysis, and other methods. Additionally, we applied various machine learning techniques, including decision trees and random forests, to assess our model's predictive strength. Univariate logistic analysis revealed 14 risk factors associated with postoperative lower limb DVT. Based on the Boruta algorithm, six significant clinical factors were selected, namely, age, D-dimer (D-D) level, low-density lipoprotein, CA125, and calcium and chloride ion levels. A nomogram was developed using the outcomes from the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The predictive model showed high accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.936 in the training set and 0.875 in the validation set. Various machine learning algorithms confirmed its strong predictive capacity. MR analysis revealed meaningful causal relationships between key clinical factors and DVT risk. Based on various machine learning methods, we developed an effective predictive diagnostic model for postoperative lower extremity DVT in GC patients. This model demonstrated excellent predictive value in both the training and validation sets. This novel model is a valuable tool for clinicians to use in identifying and managing thrombotic risks in this patient population.

Indexed as

GastrectomyMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsStomach NeoplasmsVenous ThrombosisAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveDeep vein thrombosisGastrectomyGastric cancerMachine learningRisk model

Identifiers

PMID38977780
PMCPMC11231254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.