Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977749›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reinforcement learning-trained optimisers and Bayesian optimisation for online particle accelerator tuning.

Jan Kaiser, Chenran Xu, Annika Eichler, Andrea Santamaria Garcia, Oliver Stein, Erik Bründermann, Willi Kuropka, Hannes Dinter, Frank Mayet, Thomas Vinatier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jan KaiserDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany. jan.kaiser@desy.de.
Chenran XuKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Annika EichlerDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea Santamaria GarciaKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Oliver SteinDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Erik BründermannKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Willi KuropkaDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Hannes DinterDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank MayetDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas VinatierDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian BurkartDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Holger SchlarbDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit ZT-I-PF-5-6Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft InternLabs-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online tuning of particle accelerators is a complex optimisation problem that continues to require manual intervention by experienced human operators. Autonomous tuning is a rapidly expanding field of research, where learning-based methods like Bayesian optimisation (BO) hold great promise in improving plant performance and reducing tuning times. At the same time, reinforcement learning (RL) is a capable method of learning intelligent controllers, and recent work shows that RL can also be used to train domain-specialised optimisers in so-called reinforcement learning-trained optimisation (RLO). In parallel efforts, both algorithms have found successful adoption in particle accelerator tuning. Here we present a comparative case study, assessing the performance of both algorithms while providing a nuanced analysis of the merits and the practical challenges involved in deploying them to real-world facilities. Our results will help practitioners choose a suitable learning-based tuning algorithm for their tuning tasks, accelerating the adoption of autonomous tuning algorithms, ultimately improving the availability of particle accelerators and pushing their operational limits.

Identifiers

PMID38977749
PMCPMC11231256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.