Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977682›Full record

Observational studyBlood cancer journal2024

Autologous transplant vs. CAR-T therapy in patients with DLBCL treated while in complete remission.

Mazyar Shadman, Kwang W Ahn, Manmeet Kaur, Lazaros Lekakis, Amer Beitinjaneh, Madiha Iqbal, Nausheen Ahmed, Brian Hill, Nasheed M Hossain, Peter Riedell and 20 more

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood cancer journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [Case of concurrent second branchial cleft cyst and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Mazyar ShadmanClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3365-6562
Kwang W AhnCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Manmeet KaurCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lazaros LekakisDivision of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami Hospital and Clinics, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
Amer BeitinjanehDivision of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami Hospital and Clinics, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
Madiha IqbalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6752-5440
Nausheen AhmedDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-4982
Brian HillDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nasheed M HossainDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Peter RiedellDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2719-0580
Ajay K GopalClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Natalie GroverLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Hematology Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-3157
Matthew FrigaultHematopoietic Cell Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan BrammerDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nilanjan GhoshLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-6136
Reid MerrymanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-3234
Aleksandr LazaryanDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-6436
Ron RamBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mark HertzbergPrince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8495-4669
Bipin SavaniLong Term Transplant Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-9965
Farrukh AwanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Farhad KhimaniDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Sairah AhmedDepartment of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-8299
Vaishalee P KenkreDivision of Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew UlricksonBanner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1458-7813
Nirav ShahCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4336-1071
Mohamed A Kharfan-DabajaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7394-5185
Alex HerreraDivision of Lymphoma, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Craig SauterDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mehdi HamadaniCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. mhamadani@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-510X

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NTP INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT27305C0011 · NIEHS · Z-TECH CORPORATION · 2007 to 2009
$4.3M
PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS, MICE, HAMSTERS, GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0011 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$500k
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NIEHS NIH HHS 27305C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27398C0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with relapsed DLBCL in complete remission (CR), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) and CAR-T therapy are both effective, but it is unknown which modality provides superior outcomes. We compared the efficacy of auto-HCT vs. CAR-T in patients with DLBCL in a CR. A retrospective observational study comparing auto-HCT (2015-2021) vs. CAR-T (2018-2021) using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry. Median follow-up was 49.7 months for the auto-HCT and 24.7 months for the CAR-T cohort. Patients ages 18 and 75 with a diagnosis of DLBCL were included if they received auto-HCT (n = 281) or commercial CAR-T (n = 79) while in a CR. Patients undergoing auto-HCT with only one prior therapy line and CAR-T patients with a previous history of auto-HCT treatment were excluded. Endpoints included Progression-free survival (PFS), relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). In univariate analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a higher rate of 2-year PFS (66.2% vs. 47.8%; p < 0.001), a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (27.8% vs. 48% ; p < 0.001), and a superior 2-year OS (78.9% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.037). In patients with early (within 12 months) treatment failure, auto-HCT was associated with a superior 2-year PFS (70.9% vs. 48.3% ; p < 0.001), lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (22.8% vs. 45.9% ; p < 0.001) and trend for higher 2-year OS (82.4% vs. 66.1% ; p = 0.076). In the multivariable analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a superior PFS (hazard ratio 1.83; p = 0.0011) and lower incidence of relapse (hazard ratio 2.18; p < 0.0001) compared to CAR-T. In patients with relapsed LBCL who achieve a CR, treatment with auto-HCT is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to CAR-T. These data support the consideration of auto-HCT in select patients with LBCL achieving a CR in the relapsed setting.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseTransplantation, AutologousAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponseRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38977682
PMCPMC11231252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.