Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977545›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

S-allyl-cysteine triggers cytotoxic events in rat glioblastoma RG2 and C6 cells and improves the effect of temozolomide through the regulation of oxidative responses.

Carolina Y Reyes-Soto, Ricardo J Ramírez-Carreto, Luz Belinda Ortíz-Alegría, Alejandro Silva-Palacios, Cecilia Zazueta, Sonia Galván-Arzate, Çimen Karasu, Isaac Túnez, Alexey A Tinkov, Michael Aschner and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carolina Y Reyes-SotoPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ricardo J Ramírez-CarretoUnidad de Investigación en Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 06726, Mexico City, Mexico.
Luz Belinda Ortíz-AlegríaLaboratorio de Inmunología Experimental, Subdirección de Medicina Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Secretaría de Salud, 04530, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro Silva-PalaciosDepartamento de Biomedicina Cardiovascular, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, SSA, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Cecilia ZazuetaDepartamento de Biomedicina Cardiovascular, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, SSA, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sonia Galván-ArzateDepartamento de Neuroquímica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, S.S, 14269, Mexico City, Mexico.
Çimen KarasuDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Cellular Stress Response and Signal Transduction Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Isaac TúnezDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Maimónides de Córdoba (IMIBIC)Universidad de CórdobaRed Española de Excelencia en Estimulación Cerebral (REDESTIM), 14071, Córdoba, Spain.
Alexey A TinkovLaboratory of Molecular Dietetics, IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Michael AschnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Tessy López-GoerneLaboratorio de Nanotecnología y Nanomedicina, Departamento de Atención a la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, 04960, Mexico City, Mexico.
Anahí ChavarríaUnidad de Investigación en Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 06726, Mexico City, Mexico. anahi.chavarria@facmed.unam.mx.
Abel SantamaríaLaboratorio de Nanotecnología y Nanomedicina, Departamento de Atención a la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, 04960, Mexico City, Mexico. absada@yahoo.com.

Funding

Mechanisms of Manganese NeurotoxicityR01ES010563 · NIEHS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael Aschner, Aaron B Bowman · 2001 to 2026
$11.9M
CONAHCYT 959177NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES010563NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES10563RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program 202717-0-000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive form of cancer affecting the Central Nervous System (CNS) of thousands of people every year. Redox alterations have been shown to play a key role in the development and progression of these tumors as Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation is involved in the modulation of several signaling pathways, transcription factors, and cytokine formation. The second-generation oral alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is the first-line chemotherapeutic drug used to treat of GBM, though patients often develop primary and secondary resistance, reducing its efficacy. Antioxidants represent promising and potential coadjutant agents as they can reduce excessive ROS formation derived from chemo- and radiotherapy, while decreasing pharmacological resistance. S-allyl-cysteine (SAC) has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of several types of cancer cells, though its precise antiproliferative mechanisms remain poorly investigated. To date, SAC effects have been poorly explored in GBM cells. Here, we investigated the effects of SAC in vitro, either alone or in combination with TMZ, on several toxic and modulatory endpoints-including oxidative stress markers and transcriptional regulation-in two glioblastoma cell lines from rats, RG2 and C6, to elucidate some of the biochemical and cellular mechanisms underlying its antiproliferative properties. SAC (1-750 µM) decreased cell viability in both cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner, although C6 cells were more resistant to SAC at several of the tested concentrations. TMZ also produced a concentration-dependent effect, decreasing cell viability of both cell lines. In combination, SAC (1 µM or 100 µM) and TMZ (500 µM) enhanced the effects of each other. SAC also augmented the lipoperoxidative effect of TMZ and reduced cell antioxidant resistance in both cell lines by decreasing the TMZ-induced increase in the GSH/GSSG ratio. In RG2 and C6 cells, SAC per se had no effect on Nrf2/ARE binding activity, while in RG2 cells TMZ and the combination of SAC + TMZ decreased this activity. Our results demonstrate that SAC, alone or in combination with TMZ, exerts antitumor effects mediated by regulatory mechanisms of redox activity responses. SAC is also a safe drug for testing in other models as it produces non-toxic effects in primary astrocytes. Combined, these effects suggest that SAC affords antioxidant properties and potential antitumor efficacy against GBM.

Indexed as

C6 rat cellsCytotoxicityGlioblastomaInflammatory cytokinesNrf2-ARERedox modulationRG2 rat cellsS-allyl-cysteine

Identifiers

PMID38977545
PMCPMC11231126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.