Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977466›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024

Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor budding in stage II colon cancer: exploring zero budding as a prognostic marker.

Maria Pihlmann Kristensen, Ulrik Korsgaard, Signe Timm, Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Inti Zlobec, Sanne Kjær-Frifeldt, Henrik Hager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Pihlmann KristensenDepartment of Pathology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. maria.pihlmann.kristensen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-9607
Ulrik KorsgaardDepartment of Pathology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Signe TimmInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Torben Frøstrup HansenInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Inti ZlobecInstitute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sanne Kjær-FrifeldtDepartment of Pathology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Henrik HagerDepartment of Pathology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor budding, a biomarker traditionally evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, has gained recognition as a prognostic biomarker for stage II colon cancer. Nevertheless, while H&E staining offers valuable insights, its limitations prompt the utilization of pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC). Consequently, this study seeks to evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor budding using IHC in a contemporary cohort of stage II colon cancer patients, aiming to deepen our understanding of this critical facet in cancer prognosis. We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study including 493 patients with stage II colon cancer and evaluated tumor budding using IHC, following the H&E-based guidelines proposed by the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference Group. Correlation between H&E-based and IHC-based tumor budding was assessed using a four-tiered scoring system that included a zero budding (Bd0) category. Survival analyses explored the prognostic significance of tumor budding assessed by IHC and H&E. As expected, IHC-based tumor budding evaluation yielded significantly higher bud counts compared to H&E (p < 0.01). Interestingly, 21 patients were identified with no tumor budding using IHC. This was associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival (HR = 5.19, p = 0.02) and overall survival (HR = 4.47, p = 0.04) in a multivariate analysis when compared to tumors with budding. The Bd0 category demonstrated a 100% predictive value for the absence of recurrence. In conclusion, IHC-based tumor budding evaluation in stage II colon cancer provides additional prognostic information. The absence of tumor budding is associated with a favorable prognosis and may serve as a potential marker for identifying patients with no risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColonic NeoplasmsImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm StagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryScoring systemStage II colon cancerSurvivalTumor budding

Identifiers

PMID38977466
PMCPMC11522105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.