Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977368›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial.

David Andrew Dorr, Emma Montgomery, Aisha J Ghumman, LeAnn Michaels, Abigail Rolbiecki, Shannon Canfield, Victoria Shaffer, Blake Johnson, Melinda Lockwood, Parijat Ghosh and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06124716 (Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06124716 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled550ConditionsHypertension, Multiple Chronic ConditionsArmsEnhanced COACH CDS Tool, Usual Care COACH CDS Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David Andrew DorrDepartment of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA dorrd@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-7261
Emma MontgomeryUniversity of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Aisha J GhummanDepartment of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2270-1372
LeAnn MichaelsOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abigail RolbieckiUniversity of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Shannon CanfieldUniversity of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Victoria ShafferUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Blake JohnsonOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Melinda LockwoodUniversity of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Parijat GhoshUniversity of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
William MartinezVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Richelle KoopmanUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
COACH Consortium

Funding

Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH)R18HS028579 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DORR, DAVID A., KOOPMAN, RICHELLE J · 2022 to 2024
$3.0M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS028579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertension, the clinical condition of persistent high blood pressure (BP), is preventable yet remains a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Digital self-management support tools can increase patient self-care behaviours to improve BP. We created a patient-facing and provider-facing clinical decision support (CDS) application, called the Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High BP (COACH), to integrate home BP data, guideline recommendations and patient-centred goals with primary care workflows. We leverage social cognitive theory principles to support enhanced engagement, shared decision-making and self-management support. This study aims to measure the effectiveness of the COACH intervention and evaluate its adoption as part of BP management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study design is a multisite, two-arm hybrid type III implementation randomised controlled trial set within primary care practices across three health systems. Randomised participants are adults with high BP for whom home BP monitoring is indicated. The intervention arm will receive COACH, a digital web-based intervention with effectively enhanced alerts and displays intended to drive engagement with BP lowering; the control arm will receive COACH without the alerts and a simple display. Outcome measures include BP lowering (primary) and self-efficacy (secondary). Implementation preplanning and postevaluation use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance metrics with iterative cycles for qualitative integration into the trial and its quantitative evaluation. The trial analysis includes logistic regression and constrained longitudinal data analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved under a single IRB through the University of Missouri-Columbia, #2091483. Dissemination of the intervention specifications and results will be through open-source mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06124716.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf CareSelf-ManagementClinical TrialHealth informaticsHypertensionImplementation SciencePrimary CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID38977368
PMCPMC11256044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.