Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38977304›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Oscillatory Neural Correlates of Police Firearms Decision-Making in Virtual Reality.

Nicholas A Alexander, Clíona L Kelly, Hongfang Wang, Robert A Nash, Shaun Beebe, Matthew J Brookes, Klaus Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Combining video telemetry and wearable MEG for naturalistic imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas A AlexanderWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Department of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom n.alexander@ucl.ac.uk klaus.kessler1@ucd.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5161-684X
Clíona L KellyAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7E, United Kingdom.
Hongfang WangAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7E, United Kingdom.
Robert A NashAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7E, United Kingdom.
Shaun BeebeSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QX, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2QX, United Kingdom.
Klaus KesslerAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7E, United Kingdom n.alexander@ucl.ac.uk klaus.kessler1@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the neural signatures of expert decision-making in the context of police training in a virtual reality-based shoot/don't shoot scenario. Police officers can use stopping force against a perpetrator, which may require using a firearm and each decision made by an officer to discharge their firearm or not has substantial implications. Therefore, it is important to understand the cognitive and underlying neurophysiological processes that lead to such a decision. We used virtual reality-based simulations to elicit ecologically valid behavior from authorized firearms officers (AFOs) in the UK and matched novices in a shoot/don't shoot task and recorded electroencephalography concurrently. We found that AFOs had consistently faster response times than novices, suggesting our task was sensitive to their expertise. To investigate differences in decision-making processes under varying levels of threat and expertise, we analyzed electrophysiological signals originating from the anterior cingulate cortex. In line with similar response inhibition tasks, we found greater increases in preresponse theta power when participants inhibited the response to shoot when under no threat as compared with shooting. Most importantly, we showed that when preparing against threat, theta power increase was greater for experts than novices, suggesting that differences in performance between experts and novices are due to their greater orientation toward threat. Additionally, shorter beta rebounds suggest that experts were "ready for action" sooner. More generally, we demonstrate that the investigation of expert decision-making should incorporate naturalistic stimuli and an appropriate control group to enhance validity.

Indexed as

Decision MakingElectroencephalographyFirearmsPoliceVirtual RealityAdultFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMaleReaction TimeTheta RhythmYoung Adultdecision-makingexpertisenaturalistic stimulineural oscillationspolicevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38977304
PMCPMC11289585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.