Observational studyThe Lancet. Oncology2024
Interpretable artificial intelligence to optimise use of imatinib after resection in patients with localised gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an observational cohort study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precision therapeutic strategies for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Adjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)-state of the art, controversies, and future directions.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant Imatinib Therapy in Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Tumor Downsizing, Sphincter Preservation, Transanal Surgical Platforms, Functional Outcomes, and Survival.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: History, Molecular Subtypes, and Risk Stratification.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Targeting the Unmet Need in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Contemporary Review of Investigational Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Landscape.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence models: transforming early diagnosis and precise treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Prediction of Mutations and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with Deep Learning: A Multicenter, Multinational Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- MMHC-OCPR: Prediction of Platinum Response and Recurrence Risk in Ovarian Cancer with Multimodal Deep Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Gastric Cancer-Derived Exosomes Activate Mast Cells via the SCF/c-KIT Pathway to Drive Angiogenesis and Metastasis.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Distinguishing very high-risk patients among high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor cases: development and validation of a nomogram based on a multicenter population-based retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Can artificial intelligence deliver on the promise of precision medicine?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing gastroenterology and hepatology with artificial intelligence: From precision diagnosis to equitable healthcare through interdisciplinary practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- MRI-based artificial intelligence models for post-neoadjuvant surgery personalization in breast cancer: a narrative review of evidence from Western Pacific.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Using Interpretable Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: Applications of Optimal Policy Trees as a Treatment Prescription Aid to Improve Patient Mortality.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The R.O.A.D. to precision medicine.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend use of adjuvant imatinib therapy for many patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs); however, its optimal treatment duration is unknown and some patient groups do not benefit from the therapy. We aimed to apply state-of-the-art, interpretable artificial intelligence (ie, predictions or prescription logic that can be easily understood) methods on real-world data to establish which groups of patients with GISTs should receive adjuvant imatinib, its optimal treatment duration, and the benefits conferred by this therapy.
methodsIn this observational cohort study, we considered for inclusion all patients who underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GISTs at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY, USA) between Oct 1, 1982, and Dec 31, 2017, and who were classified as intermediate or high risk according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen criteria and had complete follow-up data with no missing entries. A counterfactual random forest model, which used predictors of recurrence (mitotic count, tumour size, and tumour site) and imatinib duration to infer the probability of recurrence at 7 years for a given patient under each duration of imatinib treatment, was trained in the MSKCC cohort. Optimal policy trees (OPTs), a state-of-the-art interpretable AI-based method, were used to read the counterfactual random forest model by training a decision tree with the counterfactual predictions. The OPT recommendations were externally validated in two cohorts of patients from Poland (the Polish Clinical GIST Registry), who underwent GIST resection between Dec 1, 1981, and Dec 31, 2011, and from Spain (the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas), who underwent resection between Oct 1, 1987, and Jan 30, 2011.
findingsAmong 1007 patients who underwent GIST surgery in MSKCC, 117 were included in the internal cohort; for the external cohorts, the Polish cohort comprised 363 patients and the Spanish cohort comprised 239 patients. The OPT did not recommend imatinib for patients with GISTs of gastric origin measuring less than 15·9 cm with a mitotic count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm
interpretationIf the identified patient subgroups were applied in clinical practice, as many as a third of the current cohort of candidates who do not benefit from adjuvant imatinib would be encouraged to not receive imatinib, subsequently avoiding unnecessary toxicity on patients and financial strain on health-care systems. Our finding that 5 years is the optimal duration of imatinib treatment could be the best source of evidence to inform clinical practice until 2028, when a randomised controlled trial with the same aims is expected to report its findings.
fundingNational Cancer Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.