ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2024
Evaluation of Cellpose segmentation with sequential thresholding for instance segmentation of cytoplasms within autofluorescence images.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Breast Cancer Nuclei Segmentation, Classification, and Scoring in PR-IHC Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutofluorescence imaging of the coenzyme, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) (NAD(P)H), provides a label-free technique to assess cellular metabolism. Because NAD(P)H is localized in the cytosol and mitochondria, instance segmentation of cell cytoplasms from NAD(P)H images allows quantification of metabolism with cellular resolution. However, accurate cytoplasmic segmentation of autofluorescence images is difficult due to irregular cell shapes and cell clusters.
methodHere, a cytoplasm segmentation method is presented and tested. First, autofluorescence images are segmented into cells via either hand-segmentation or Cellpose, a deep learning-based segmentation method. Then, a cytoplasmic post-processing algorithm (CPPA) is applied for cytoplasmic segmentation. CPPA uses a binarized segmentation image to remove non-segmented pixels from the NAD(P)H image and then applies an intensity-based threshold to identify nuclei regions. Errors at cell edges are removed using a distance transform algorithm. The nucleus mask is then subtracted from the cell segmented image to yield the cytoplasm mask image. CPPA was tested on five NAD(P)H images of three different cell samples, quiescent T cells, activated T cells, and MCF7 cells.
resultsUsing POSEA, an evaluation method tailored for instance segmentation, the CPPA yielded F-measure values of 0.89, 0.87, and 0.94 for quiescent T cells, activated T cells, and MCF7 cells, respectively, for cytoplasm identification of hand-segmented cells. CPPA achieved F-measure values of 0.84, 0.74, and 0.72 for Cellpose segmented cells.
conclusionThese results exceed the F-measure value of a comparative cell segmentation method (CellProfiler, ∼0.50-0.60) and support the use of artificial intelligence and post-processing techniques for accurate segmentation of autofluorescence images for single-cell metabolic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.