Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976766›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Ancient genomes reveal over two thousand years of dingo population structure.

Yassine Souilmi, Sally Wasef, Matthew P Williams, Gabriel Conroy, Ido Bar, Pere Bover, Jackson Dann, Holly Heiniger, Bastien Llamas, Steven Ogbourne and 11 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impacts of European arrival on Australian dingoes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yassine Souilmi *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7543-4864
Sally Wasef *Ancient DNA Facility, Defence Genomics, Genomics Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
Matthew P WilliamsAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Gabriel ConroySchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4556, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-827X
Ido BarCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-4233
Pere BoverFundación Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacióny el Desarrollo (ARAID), Zaragoza 50018, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-2840
Jackson DannGrützner Laboratory of Comparative Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3236-3215
Holly HeinigerAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), Adelaide SA 5005, Australia.
Bastien LlamasAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-9176
Steven OgbourneCentre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4556, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-4367
Michael ArcherEarth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-4039
J William O BallardSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Elizabeth ReedEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia.
Raymond ToblerAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-1473
Loukas KoungoulosArchaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-0142
Keryn WalsheSchool of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Joanne L WrightQueensland Department of Education, Kelvin Grove State College, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-6400
Jane BalmeSchool of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Sue O'ConnorArchaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9381-078X
Alan Cooper *Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-7851
Kieren J Mitchell *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-0262

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) CE170100015Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP210101960Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FL140100260DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2021/GNT2011277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dingoes are culturally and ecologically important free-living canids whose ancestors arrived in Australia over 3,000 B.P., likely transported by seafaring people. However, the early history of dingoes in Australia-including the number of founding populations and their routes of introduction-remains uncertain. This uncertainty arises partly from the complex and poorly understood relationship between modern dingoes and New Guinea singing dogs, and suspicions that post-Colonial hybridization has introduced recent domestic dog ancestry into the genomes of many wild dingo populations. In this study, we analyzed genome-wide data from nine ancient dingo specimens ranging in age from 400 to 2,746 y old, predating the introduction of domestic dogs to Australia by European colonists. We uncovered evidence that the continent-wide population structure observed in modern dingo populations had already emerged several thousand years ago. We also detected excess allele sharing between New Guinea singing dogs and ancient dingoes from coastal New South Wales (NSW) compared to ancient dingoes from southern Australia, irrespective of any post-Colonial hybrid ancestry in the genomes of modern individuals. Our results are consistent with several demographic scenarios, including a scenario where the ancestry of dingoes from the east coast of Australia results from at least two waves of migration from source populations with varying affinities to New Guinea singing dogs. We also contribute to the growing body of evidence that modern dingoes derive little genomic ancestry from post-Colonial hybridization with other domestic dog lineages, instead descending primarily from ancient canids introduced to Sahul thousands of years ago.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsAustraliaDNA, AncientDogsGenetics, PopulationWolvesDNA, Ancientancient DNAdingodomesticationOceaniaPalaeogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38976766
PMCPMC11287250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.