Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976704›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Correlation between dysbiosis of vaginal microecology and endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xuemei Qing, Min Xie, Ping Liu, Ou Feng, Hong Leng, Hongying Guo, Yong Zhang, Ying Ma, Wenxin Zheng

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Role of the Microbiome in Endometriosis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuemei QingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9443-3554
Min XieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ou FengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hong LengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hongying GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Ying MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0009-0009-1229-8936
Wenxin ZhengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Pathology, Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis, a complex gynecological condition, involves inflammation and immune dysregulation. The vaginal microbiota, characterized by its diversity, is an integral part of the vaginal microecology-interacting with vaginal anatomy, the endocrine system, and local mucosal immunity. Imbalances in this microecology are known to precipitate various inflammatory diseases. Despite extensive research, the connection between vaginal microbiota dysbiosis and endometriosis remains a subject of debate. Our study assesses the association between vaginal microecology dysbiosis and endometriosis.

methodsWe systematically searched major electronic databases in English, including Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), BIOSIS (Ovid), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang, up to August 15, 2023. Selected articles underwent screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Normal vaginal microecology was defined as a negative Amsel/Spiegel test or Nugent score of 0-3, or Lactobacillus predominance determined by 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing. Deviations from this norm were classified as dysbiosis, further categorized into bacterial vaginosis (BV) and intermediate BV. Data analysis utilized Revman 5.4, with effect sizes presented as Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI).

resultsOut of 1081 articles, eight met the inclusion criteria. Utilizing fixed-effect models due to low heterogeneity, the analysis revealed a positive association between dysbiosis and endometriosis (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.70; I2 = 0%), but showed a slight negative association between normal vaginal microecology with endometriosis (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.55-1.46; I2 = 29%). However, the association was not significant. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses corroborated the stability of these associations.

conclusionA positive correlation exists between vaginal microecology dysbiosis and endometriosis, notably with intermediate BV. However, the mechanisms underpinning this relationship remain elusive, highlighting the need for further research to overcome limitations.

trial registrationRegistration number: CRD42023445163.

Indexed as

DysbiosisEndometriosisMicrobiotaVaginaFemaleHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVaginosis, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38976704
PMCPMC11230536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.