Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976495›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Sex-specific resilience of neocortex to food restriction.

Zahid Padamsey, Danai Katsanevaki, Patricia Maeso, Manuela Rizzi, Emily E Osterweil, Nathalie L Rochefort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brain Nutrient Sensing: A Unifying Framework.Annual review of physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zahid PadamseyWellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-8210
Danai KatsanevakiCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Patricia MaesoCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Manuela RizziCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Emily E OsterweilCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nathalie L RochefortCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-6221

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T007907/1European Research Council 866386Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 Zahid PadamseySimons Initiative for the Developing Brain Danai KatsanevakiWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 10.35802/102857Wellcome Trust-University of Edinburgh Institutional Strategic Support Fund ISSF3 N. Rochefort
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals have evolved sex-specific adaptations to reduce energy usage in times of food scarcity. These adaptations are well described for peripheral tissue, though much less is known about how the energy-expensive brain adapts to food restriction, and how such adaptations differ across the sexes. Here, we examined how food restriction impacts energy usage and function in the primary visual cortex (V1) of adult male and female mice. Molecular analysis and RNA sequencing in V1 revealed that in males, but not in females, food restriction significantly modulated canonical, energy-regulating pathways, including pathways associated waith AMP-activated protein kinase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, mammalian target of rapamycin, and oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, we found that in contrast to males, food restriction in females did not significantly affect V1 ATP usage or visual coding precision (assessed by orientation selectivity). Decreased serum leptin is known to be necessary for triggering energy-saving changes in V1 during food restriction. Consistent with this, we found significantly decreased serum leptin in food-restricted males but no significant change in food-restricted females. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that cortical function and energy usage in female mice are more resilient to food restriction than in males. The neocortex, therefore, contributes to sex-specific, energy-saving adaptations in response to food restriction.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismNeocortexAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCaloric RestrictionFemaleFood DeprivationLeptinMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsVisual CortexLeptinATPfemalefood restrictionleptinmouseneurosciencesex-specificityvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38976495
PMCPMC11230624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.