Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976419›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2024

The mind wanders to dark places: Mind-wandering catalyzes rumination in the context of negative affect and impulsivity.

Ellie P Xu, Jiani Li, Sarah L Zapetis, Timothy J Trull, Jonathan P Stange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellie P XuDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California.ORCID 0000-0001-7234-4134
Jiani LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California.
Sarah L ZapetisDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California.
Timothy J TrullDepartment of Psychology, University of Missouri.
Jonathan P StangeDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California.ORCID 0000-0003-3718-5945

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
Ambulatory phenotyping with real-time indices of discordant affect regulation: Exploring opportunities for targeted intervention in depressionR01MH133842 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jonathan P Stange · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
From Networks to the Real World: Integrating Neural and Autonomic Processes of LossK23MH112769 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STANGE, JONATHAN P · 2017 to 2021
$931k
National Science FoundationNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112769NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous mind-wandering has been theorized to increase susceptibility for rumination, contributing to risk for major depressive disorder (MDD). Clarifying whether-and under what circumstances-mind-wandering leads to rumination could inform the development of targeted interventions to reduce risk for ruminative sequelae. Using intensively sampled data in 44 young adults with remitted MDD and 38 healthy volunteers with 1,558 total observations collected from 2018 to 2022, we conducted multilevel models to investigate temporal relationships between mind-wandering and rumination. Contextual factors (e.g., intensity of negative affect; momentary impulsivity) and individual factors (e.g., MDD history) were examined as moderators of these relationships. Mind-wandering predicted increased rumination, whereas rumination did not predict increased mind-wandering. When individuals experienced greater negative affect or acted more impulsively compared to their usual levels, they showed a stronger relationship between mind-wandering and subsequent rumination. Depression history did not significantly moderate temporal relationships between mind-wandering and rumination. Spontaneous mind-wandering may transition into rumination, particularly during moments when people experience more negative affect or impulsivity compared to usual. Delivering interventions in these moments could reduce risk for ruminative sequelae. The tendency to ruminate in response to mind-wandering is suggested to be consistent regardless of depression history, suggesting the transdiagnostic and dimensional nature of rumination as a possible consequence of mind-wandering. Future work is needed to determine whether these associations are generalizable across the lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AffectImpulsive BehaviorMajor Depressive DisorderRumination, CognitiveAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleThinkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38976419
PMCPMC11850280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.