Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976266›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

A Hospice Transitions Program for Patients in the Emergency Department.

Christopher W Baugh, Kei Ouchi, Jason K Bowman, Ayal A Aizer, Alexander W Zirulnik, Martha Wadleigh, Angela Wise, Paula Remón Baranda, Richard E Leiter, Bradley J Molyneaux and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Christopher W BaughDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kei OuchiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason K BowmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ayal A AizerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexander W ZirulnikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martha WadleighDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angela WiseMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paula Remón BarandaDartmouth Engineering Thayer School, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Richard E LeiterDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bradley J MolyneauxDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrea McCabeMass General Brigham Home Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Panupong HansrivijitDivision of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kate LallyDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa LittlefieldOffice of the Chief Operating Officer, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexei M WagnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katherine H WalkerDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hojjat SalmasianDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kourosh RavvazDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jada A DevlinMass General Brigham Home Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karen Lewis BrownellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew P VitaleDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Frantzie C FirminOffice of the Chief Operating Officer, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nelia JainDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane deLima ThomasDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
James A TulskyDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Soumi RayDepartment of Analytics, Planning, Strategy and Improvement, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lynne M O'MaraOffice of the Chief Operating Officer, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth M RickersonDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mallika L MenduDivision of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients often visit the emergency department (ED) near the end of life. Their common disposition is inpatient hospital admission, which can result in a delayed transition to hospice care and, ultimately, an inpatient hospital death that may be misaligned with their goals of care. Objective: To assess the association of hospice use with a novel multidisciplinary hospice program to rapidly identify and enroll eligible patients presenting to the ED near end of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pre-post quality improvement study of a novel, multifaceted care transitions program involving a formalized pathway with email alerts, clinician training, hospice vendor expansion, metric creation, and data tracking was conducted at a large, urban tertiary care academic medical center affiliated with a comprehensive cancer center among adult patients presenting to the ED near the end of life. The control period before program launch was from September 1, 2018, to January 31, 2020, and the intervention period after program launch was from August 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was a transition to hospice without hospital admission and/or hospice admission within 96 hours of the ED visit. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and in-hospital mortality. Results: This study included 270 patients (median age, 74.0 years [IQR, 62.0-85.0 years]; 133 of 270 women [49.3%]) in the control period, and 388 patients (median age, 73.0 years [IQR, 60.0-84.0 years]; 208 of 388 women [53.6%]) in the intervention period, identified as eligible for hospice transition within 96 hours of ED arrival. In the control period, 61 patients (22.6%) achieved the primary outcome compared with 210 patients (54.1%) in the intervention period (P < .001). The intervention was associated with the primary outcome after adjustment for age, race and ethnicity, primary payer, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and presence of a Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.02; 95% CI, 3.17-7.94). In addition, the presence of a MOLST was independently associated with hospice transition across all groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-2.99). There was no significant difference between the control and intervention periods in inpatient length of stay (median, 2.0 days [IQR, 1.1-3.0 days] vs 1.9 days [IQR, 1.1-3.0 days]; P = .84), but in-hospital mortality was lower in the intervention period (48.5% [188 of 388] vs 64.4% [174 of 270]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this quality improvement study, a multidisciplinary program to facilitate ED patient transitions was associated with hospice use. Further investigation is needed to examine the generalizability and sustainability of the program.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospice CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferQuality ImprovementTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID38976266
PMCPMC11231795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.