ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Dosimetric characteristics of self-expandable metallic and plastic stents for transpapillary biliary decompression in external beam radiotherapy.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different Approaches to Extracting Proximally Migrated or Broken and Retained Pancreatic Stents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is little evidence regarding radiation dose perturbation caused by the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) used for transpapillary biliary decompression. We aimed to compare SEMSs with plastic stents (PSs) and clarify their dosimetric characteristics. Fifteen SEMSs (10 braided and 5 lasercut type) and six PSs (diameter: 2.3-3.3 mm) were inserted into a water-equivalent solid phantom. In total, 13 SEMSs had radiopaque markers, whereas the other two did not. Using radiochromic films, the dose difference adjacent to the stents at locations proximal, distal, and arc delivery to the radiation source was evaluated based on comparison to measurement of the dose delivery in phantom without any stent in place. The median values of the dose difference for each stent were used to compare the SEMS and PS groups.Results: The dose difference (median (minimum/maximum)) was as follows: proximal, SEMSs + 2.1% (1.8 / 4.7) / PSs + 5.4% (4.1 / 6.3) (p < 0.001); distal, SEMSs -1.0% (-1.6 /-0.4) / PSs -8.9% (-11.7 / -7.4) (p < 0.001); arc delivery, SEMSs 1.2% (0.9 / 2.3) / PSs 2.2% (1.6 / 3.6) (p = 0.005). These results demonstrated that the dose differences of SEMSs were significantly smaller than those of PSs. On the other hand, the dose difference was large at surface of the radiopaque markers for SEMSs: proximal, 10.3% (7.2 / 20.9); distal, -8.4% (-16.3 / -4.2); arc delivery, 5.5% (4.2 / 9.2). SEMSs for biliary decompression can be safely used in patients undergoing radiotherapy, by focusing on the dose distribution around the stents and by paying attention to local changes in the dose distribution of radiopaque markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38976186What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.