ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2024
Extracellular Microvesicles vs. Mitochondria: Competing for the Top Spot in Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioenergetics-Driven Extracellular Vesicle Therapies for Heart Failure: From Preclinical Insights to Regenerative Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Mitochondrial transfer as a driver of immune microenvironment remodeling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Transfer Between Cancer and T Cells: Implications for Immune Evasion.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biotechnological approaches and therapeutic potential of mitochondria transfer and transplantation.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Extracellular microvesicles/exosomes-magic bullets in horizontal transfer between cells of mitochondria and molecules regulating mitochondria activity.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2025Review
- Mitochondria Transfer in Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Unraveling the Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Applications of Engineered Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Enhanced Angiogenesis in Cardiac and Cerebral Ischemia.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Extracellular Microvesicles vs. Mitochondria: Competing for the Top Spot in Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- The landscape of mitochondrial transplantation: A bibliometric analysis.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative medicine aims to restore, replace, and regenerate human cells, tissues, and organs. Despite significant advancements, many cell therapy trials for cardiovascular diseases face challenges like cell survival and immune compatibility, with benefits largely stemming from paracrine effects. Two promising therapeutic tools have been recently emerged in cardiovascular diseases: extracellular vesicles (EVs) and mitochondrial transfer. Concerning EVs, the first pivotal study with EV-enriched secretome derived from cardiovascular progenitor cells has been done treating heart failure. This first in man demonstrated the safety and feasibility of repeated intravenous infusions and highlighted significant clinical improvements, including enhanced cardiac function and reduced symptoms in heart failure patients. The second study uncovered a novel mechanism of endothelial regeneration through mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes (TNTs). This research showed that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) transfer mitochondria to endothelial cells, significantly enhancing their bioenergetics and vessel-forming capabilities. This mitochondrial transfer was crucial for endothelial cell engraftment and function, offering a new strategy for vascular regeneration without the need for additional cell types. Combining EV and mitochondrial strategies presents new clinical opportunities. These approaches could revolutionize regenerative medicine, offering new hope for treating cardiovascular and other degenerative diseases. Continued research and clinical trials will be crucial in optimizing these therapies, potentially leading to personalized medicine approaches that enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38976143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.