Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975896›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

EGPDI: identifying protein-DNA binding sites based on multi-view graph embedding fusion.

Mengxin Zheng, Guicong Sun, Xueping Li, Yongxian Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengxin ZhengSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3777-2641
Guicong SunSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4597-0268
Xueping LiSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Yongxian FanSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-8092

Funding

Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2023GXNSFAA026054Innovation Project of GUET Graduate Education 2024YCXS049National Natural Science Foundation of China 62162015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms of protein-DNA interactions are involved in a wide range of biological activities and processes. Accurately identifying binding sites between proteins and DNA is crucial for analyzing genetic material, exploring protein functions, and designing novel drugs. In recent years, several computational methods have been proposed as alternatives to time-consuming and expensive traditional experiments. However, accurately predicting protein-DNA binding sites still remains a challenge. Existing computational methods often rely on handcrafted features and a single-model architecture, leaving room for improvement. We propose a novel computational method, called EGPDI, based on multi-view graph embedding fusion. This approach involves the integration of Equivariant Graph Neural Networks (EGNN) and Graph Convolutional Networks II (GCNII), independently configured to profoundly mine the global and local node embedding representations. An advanced gated multi-head attention mechanism is subsequently employed to capture the attention weights of the dual embedding representations, thereby facilitating the integration of node features. Besides, extra node features from protein language models are introduced to provide more structural information. To our knowledge, this is the first time that multi-view graph embedding fusion has been applied to the task of protein-DNA binding site prediction. The results of five-fold cross-validation and independent testing demonstrate that EGPDI outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Further comparative experiments and case studies also verify the superiority and generalization ability of EGPDI.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDNADNA-Binding ProteinsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBinding SitesProtein BindingDNADNA-Binding Proteinsequivariant graph neural networkgated attention mechanismmulti-view graph embedding fusionprotein–DNA binding site predictionprotein language models

Identifiers

PMID38975896
PMCPMC11229037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.