Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975893›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

DrugMetric: quantitative drug-likeness scoring based on chemical space distance.

Bowen Li, Zhen Wang, Ziqi Liu, Yanxin Tao, Chulin Sha, Min He, Xiaolin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insights into Bioactive Constituents from Pericarp ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Gingerols and Shogaols ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bowen LiHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Zhen WangHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Ziqi LiuHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Yanxin TaoHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Chulin ShaHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Min HeHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolin LiHangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018 Zhejiang, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3600902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of drug discovery is widely known to be lengthy and resource-intensive. Artificial Intelligence approaches bring hope for accelerating the identification of molecules with the necessary properties for drug development. Drug-likeness assessment is crucial for the virtual screening of candidate drugs. However, traditional methods like Quantitative Estimation of Drug-likeness (QED) struggle to distinguish between drug and non-drug molecules accurately. Additionally, some deep learning-based binary classification models heavily rely on selecting training negative sets. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel unsupervised learning framework called DrugMetric, an innovative framework for quantitatively assessing drug-likeness based on the chemical space distance. DrugMetric blends the powerful learning ability of variational autoencoders with the discriminative ability of the Gaussian Mixture Model. This synergy enables DrugMetric to identify significant differences in drug-likeness across different datasets effectively. Moreover, DrugMetric incorporates principles of ensemble learning to enhance its predictive capabilities. Upon testing over a variety of tasks and datasets, DrugMetric consistently showcases superior scoring and classification performance. It excels in quantifying drug-likeness and accurately distinguishing candidate drugs from non-drugs, surpassing traditional methods including QED. This work highlights DrugMetric as a practical tool for drug-likeness scoring, facilitating the acceleration of virtual drug screening, and has potential applications in other biochemical fields.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationschemical spacedeep learningdrug-likenessunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38975893
PMCPMC11229036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.