Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975770›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2024

How advancements in molecular biology impact education and training.

Rheanna E Walther, Michael Hrabak, Douglas A Bernstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rheanna E Walther *Ball State Biology Department, Muncie, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2047-4874
Michael Hrabak *Ball State Biology Department, Muncie, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2163-4895
Douglas A BernsteinBall State Biology Department, Muncie, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-8562

Funding

Distinguishing features of C. albicans pseudouridylation and their roles in pathogenesisR15AI130950 · NIAID · BALL STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERNSTEIN, DOUGLAS A. · 2017 to 2025
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI130950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular biology, broadly defined as the investigation of complex biomolecules in the laboratory, is a rapidly advancing field and as such the technologies available to investigators are constantly evolving. This constant advancement has obvious advantages because it allows students and researchers to perform more complex experiments in shorter periods of time. One challenge with such a rapidly advancing field is that techniques that had been vital for students to learn how to perform are now not essential for a laboratory scientist. For example, while cloning a gene in the past could have led to a publication and form the bulk of a PhD thesis project, technology has now made this process only a step toward one of these larger goals and can, in many cases, be performed by a company or core facility. As teachers and mentors, it is imperative that we understand that the technologies we teach in the lab and classroom must also evolve to match these advancements. In this perspective, we discuss how the rapid advances in gene synthesis technologies are affecting curriculum and how our classrooms should evolve to ensure our lessons prepare students for the world in which they will do science.

Indexed as

cloningDNA sequencinggene synthesisin silicoin vitrolaboratory exercisemolecular biology

Identifiers

PMID38975770
PMCPMC11360415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.