Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975763›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2024

Victor de Lorenzo, Danilo Pérez-Pantoja, Pablo I Nikel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolic Engineering ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond the Usual Suspects: EmergingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. CLCEnvironmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Natural and Synthetic Metabolic Architectures.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Functional organization and regulatory logic of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Unique metabolic traits ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor de LorenzoSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Campus Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-2731
Danilo Pérez-PantojaInstituto Universitario de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana (UTEM), Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-2162
Pablo I NikelThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Systems Environmental Microbiology Group, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9313-7481

Funding

COGNITIVE EFFECTS OF CHRONIC CANNABIS USER01DA006555 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FLETCHER, JACK M · 1989 to 1990
–
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) FONDECYT 1240415, PIA/BASAL FB0002Comunidad de Madrid (Community of Madrid) Y2020/TCS- 6555EC | HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (Horizon Europe) H2020-BIO-CN-2019-870294, HORIZON-CL6-2021- UE 101060625Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF) NNF10CC1016517, NNF18CC0033664Universidad Tecnologica Metropolitana Regular Research Projects 2023, LPR23-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although members of the genus

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalPseudomonas putidaSoil MicrobiologySynthetic BiologyMetabolic EngineeringPlasmidsbiodegradationmetabolic engineeringPseudomonas putidasynthetic biologytransmetabolism

Identifiers

PMID38975763
PMCPMC11270871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.