Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975584›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2024

Determination of optimal energy system and level for growing pigs.

Sangwoo Park, Jeehwan Choe, Jin Ho Cho, Ki Beom Jang, Hyunjin Kyoung, Kyeong Il Park, Yonghee Kim, Jinmu Ahn, Hyeun Bum Kim, Minho Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sangwoo ParkDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-1374
Jeehwan ChoeDepartment of Livestock, Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-972X
Jin Ho ChoDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778
Ki Beom JangDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 2769, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-9569
Hyunjin KyoungDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-5374
Kyeong Il ParkDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-3993
Yonghee KimDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8334-3706
Jinmu AhnDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1490-2974
Hyeun Bum KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-6090
Minho SongDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-5212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study mainly evaluated the responses in growth performance of growing pigs to different energy systems and energy levels in diets. Subsequently, we compared the nutrient digestibility and digestible nutrient concentrations of each energy level diet. In experiment 1, a total of 144 growing pigs with an average initial body weight (BW) of 26.69 ± 7.39 kg were randomly allotted to six dietary treatments (four pigs/pen; six replicates/treatment) according to a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement resulting from two energy systems (metabolizable energy [ME] and net energy [NE]) and three energy levels (low [LE], recommended [C], and high energy [HE]). Pigs were fed the experimental diets for 6 weeks and were allowed free access to feed and water during the experimental period. In experiment 2, 12 growing pigs with an average initial BW of 27.0 ± 1.8 kg were randomly allotted to individual metabolism crates and fed the six diets in a replicated 6 × 6 Latin square design. The six dietary treatments were identical to those used in the growth trial. Pigs were fed their respective diets at 2.5 times the estimated energy requirement for maintenance per day, and this was divided into two equal meals provided twice per day during the experimental period. Differences in energy systems and energy levels had no significant effect on the growth performance or nutrient digestibility (except acid-hydrolyzed ether extract [AEE]) of growing pigs in the current study. However, the digestible concentrations of ether extract, AEE, and acid detergent fiber (g/kg dry matter [DM]) in diets significantly increased (

Indexed as

Energy concentrationEnergy levelEnergy systemGrowing pigsMetabolic responseNet energy

Identifiers

PMID38975584
PMCPMC11222115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.