ArticleCureus2024
Congenital Fibrosis of Extraocular Muscles: A Retrospective Study of 76 Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) is a non-progressive sporadic or familial disease characterized by abnormal innervation of the extraocular muscles. This study aims to evaluate the types of diseases, management steps, and surgical outcomes. Methodology A total of 76 patients diagnosed with CFEOM between 2000 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into CFEOM 1, 2, or 3 based on clinical findings. Preoperative and postoperative ocular deviations, as well as abnormal head positions (AHPs), of the patients were evaluated. Excellent outcomes for the head position were defined as less than 5°, good as less than 10°, and poor as greater than 10°. Excellent alignment for strabismus was considered to be less than 10 prism diopters (PD), good as less than 20 PD, and poor as greater than 20 PD. Results The average age at the first surgery in our clinic was 11.6 (1-51) years. The mean follow-up was 28.6 ± 7.4 months (range = 4-56 months). Type 1 disease was detected in 48 (63.2%) patients, type 2 disease in eight (10.5%), and type 3 disease in 20 (26.3%) patients. Of the 49 patients with AHP, 20 achieved excellent outcomes, 17 had good outcomes, and the remaining had poor outcomes. Ocular alignment in the primary position following the latest surgery was excellent in 30 patients, good in 26 patients, and poor in 20 patients. Conclusions No single best surgical method can be universally applied to every patient diagnosed with CFEOM. Patients must be evaluated individually and carefully, and the appropriate surgical procedure must be chosen. In this way, satisfactory gaze alignment and improvement of the AHP can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.