ArticleCureus2024
Improving Theatre Productivity by Digitising Surgical Equipment Repairs.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction A few cancelled surgeries are due to surgical equipment issues representing a significant burden to both patients and National Health Service (NHS) hospitals on waiting lists. Despite this, there remain very few strategies designed to tackle these avoidable cancellations, especially in combination with digitisation. Our aim was to demonstrate improved efficiency through a pilot study in collaboration with Broomfield Hospital (Broomfield, United Kingdom), MediShout Ltd (London, United Kingdom), and B. Braun Medical Ltd (Sheffield, United Kingdom) with the digitalisation of the equipment repair pathway. Methods MediShout digitised two distinct repair pathways: ad-hoc repairs and maintenance equipment services (MES). Pre- and post-digitisation outcome measures were collected including the number of process steps, staff contribution time, non-staff continuation time, turnaround time, cancelled surgeries, planned preventative maintenance compliance, and staff satisfaction. The number of steps, staff contribution time, and non-staff contribution time were calculated using cognitive task analyses and time-motion studies, respectively. Turnaround time and cancellation data were taken from existing hospital data sets and staff satisfaction was measured through two staff surveys. Results Digitising the ad-hoc repair pathway reduced the number of steps by 18 (118 to 100) and saved 74 minutes of total staff time (Broomfield Hospital and B. Braun) per repair, resulting in annual efficiency savings of £21,721.48. Digitising the MES repair pathway reduced the number of steps by 13 (74 to 61) and saved 56 minutes of total staff time per repair, resulting in annual efficiency savings of £3469.44. Turnaround time for the repaired kit decreased by 14 days and 29 days for the digital ad-hoc and digital MES pathways, respectively. Elective operations cancelled due to equipment issues decreased by 44%, from 1.5 operations/month pre-pilot to 0.83 operations/month post-pilot. Planned preventative maintenance compliance across the MES pathway increased by 67% (33% to 100%). Staff satisfaction with the repair pathway improved from 12% to 96%. Conclusion This pilot study showcases the numerous benefits that can be achieved through digitisation and offers an innovative case study to approach avoidable cancellations due to equipment failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.