Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975502›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Narrative Review on the Clinical Utility of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Georgios P Panagakis, Nikolaos Machairiotis, Maria Tsiriva, Charalampos Theofanakis, Paraskevi Tsetsa, Athanasios G Pantelis, Nikolaos Thomakos, Alexandros Rodolakis, Dimitrios Haidopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Georgios P PanagakisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Nikolaos MachairiotisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attiko University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Maria TsirivaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Charalampos TheofanakisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Paraskevi TsetsaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Athanasios G PantelisSurgeon, Obesity and Metabolic Disorders Department, Athens Medical Group, Psychiko Clinic, Athens, GRC.
Nikolaos ThomakosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Alexandros RodolakisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Dimitrios HaidopoulosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colposcopy constitutes a pivotal step in the diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; nevertheless, the method has several inherent and external limitations. Electrical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) has been among the adjuncts that have been developed to increase the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy. EIS is based on the principle that the trajectory of electrical current alters depending on the consistency of the tissues. In the present study, we investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of EIS by means of searching the available evidence. Our search yielded 17 articles during the period 2005-2023. Subsequently, we focused on the performance metrics of the included studies. The general concept is that EIS, in combination with colposcopy, is a method with increased sensitivity and specificity in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as compared to colposcopy alone. However, we documented a heterogeneous distribution of these and other metrics, including the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we located potential confounders that might hamper the measurements of EIS and, as such, warrant further investigation in future research. We conclude that future studies should be directed towards randomized multicentric trials, whereas the advent of artificial intelligence might improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method by helping incorporate a large amount of data.

Indexed as

cervical cancer diagnosiscervical cancer preventioncervical intraepithelial neoplasiacolposcopyelectrical impedance spectroscopyzedscan

Identifiers

PMID38975502
PMCPMC11227105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.