ReviewCureus2024
A Narrative Review on the Clinical Utility of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Do Human Papilloma Virus and Cytological Testing Results Before Colposcopy Alter the Pathological Grading of Colposcopy Acetic Acid Visual Examination?: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colposcopy constitutes a pivotal step in the diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; nevertheless, the method has several inherent and external limitations. Electrical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) has been among the adjuncts that have been developed to increase the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy. EIS is based on the principle that the trajectory of electrical current alters depending on the consistency of the tissues. In the present study, we investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of EIS by means of searching the available evidence. Our search yielded 17 articles during the period 2005-2023. Subsequently, we focused on the performance metrics of the included studies. The general concept is that EIS, in combination with colposcopy, is a method with increased sensitivity and specificity in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as compared to colposcopy alone. However, we documented a heterogeneous distribution of these and other metrics, including the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we located potential confounders that might hamper the measurements of EIS and, as such, warrant further investigation in future research. We conclude that future studies should be directed towards randomized multicentric trials, whereas the advent of artificial intelligence might improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method by helping incorporate a large amount of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.