ArticleCureus2024
Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Flatfoot in the Al-Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Flatfoot is a syndrome that includes multiple static and dynamic deformities, characterized by the flattening of the medial arch. It is a common disorder that may affect any age group, causing foot malalignment, pain, and loss of function. Community awareness about flatfoot is essential for the prevention and control of flatfoot complications, ultimately improving the quality of life. The current study aimed to assess community knowledge and attitudes about flatfoot in the Al-Jouf region, Saudi Arabia. Methods The study enrolled 315 participants from different sectors of the Saudi population in the Al-Jouf region. An online questionnaire was distributed to them. Answers were scored on a scale of five (never "1", rarely "2", sometimes "3", often "4", always "5"). The level of their knowledge was determined by calculating the scores. Results There were significant disparities in the answers, with the majority of participants denying the effect of flatfoot on walking (135, 42.9%), running (123, 39%), standing for long periods (186, 59%), or causing tripping. More than half of the participants agreed that flatfoot never affects school activities or participation in clubs or activities after school. However, most participants showed a good attitude toward individuals with flatfoot, as they were not bothered by their way of walking (199, 63.2%) or how their foot or ankle looks (255, 80.9%), and never embarrassed them because of their foot or ankle (266, 84.5%). Most participants agreed that no one has the right to be unkind to them because of their foot or ankle (276, 87.5%). These positive attitudes are likely due to the cultural norms of the community. Conclusion There is a decreased level of awareness about the effects of flatfoot on daily physical activities among the Saudi population in the Al-Jouf region. However, their attitude toward people suffering from flatfoot is highly appreciated. Health education programs are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.