Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975486›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Genitofemoral Nerve Variation: An Attempt to Explain the Embryological Basis via a Case Report.

Sanjukta Sahoo, Kc Pradheep Kumar, Ravi K Narayan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanjukta SahooAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Kc Pradheep KumarAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Ravi K NarayanAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genitofemoral nerve (GFN) presents with a variable course in nearly half of the population. This variation can be seen in its availability, course, and branching. Here, a notable case during a cadaveric dissection revealed an unusually high bifurcation of the GFN on the left side, contrasting with the typical bifurcation observed on the right. This divergence was highlighted using colored markers to aid educational visualization, facilitating a comprehensive learning experience about the nerve's variability and its functional implications, such as the cremasteric reflex. Embryologically, these variations stem from the migratory paths of myotomes during development, influenced by extrinsic signals and growth factors. Despite the high incidence of anatomical variability, the muscular structure remains consistent, suggesting that the nerve's formation is more susceptible to developmental shifts than the muscles it innervates. Clinically, understanding GFN variations is crucial due to the nerve's involvement in conditions like genitofemoral neuropathy, which can arise from surgical procedures. Accurate knowledge of these variations aids in precise diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, reducing complications, and enhancing patient outcomes in lower abdominal and groin surgeries. However, further research is needed to elucidate the exact embryological and genetic underpinnings of these variations.

Indexed as

anatomic variationbranchinggenitofemoral nervenerve blockneuralgia

Identifiers

PMID38975486
PMCPMC11226732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.