ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of Using Nesting Care on Heart Rate, Oxygen Saturation, and Pain Among Premature Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupportive positioning may mimic the intrauterine environment and enhance neonates' physiological and developmental outcomes. Limited research in Saudi Arabia examined the effect of supportive positioning aids (nesting) on infant outcomes in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
objectiveThis study compared nesting care to non-nesting care in the short-term outcomes of premature neonates (heart rate, oxygen saturation, and pain) in Saudi NICUs.
methodsA quasi-experimental design compared two groups of premature neonates from two NICUs regarding their heart rate, oxygen saturation, and pain level. Nesting was used in the first group, and not in the second group. Seventy premature neonates (35 per group) were recruited. An independent t-test was used to compare the two groups.
resultsHeart rate was significantly lower in the nesting group than the non-nesting group at baseline and after procedures (136bpm and 139bpm vs 144bpm and 148bpm, P ≤ 0.05). The pain level was significantly lower in the nesting group than the non-nesting group at baseline and after procedures (3.7 and 3.8 vs 4.7 and 4.6, P ≤ 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in oxygen saturation.
conclusionNesting care supported premature neonates in the NICU. It helped stabilize the heart rate and pain. NICUs in Saudi Arabia would benefit from educating NICU nurses and informing NICU managers and policymakers of nesting care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.