ArticleCureus2024
Predicting Gait Speed Improvement in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients: The Role of Evans Index and Ventricular Volume.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the association between specific imaging parameters, namely, the Evans index (EI) and ventricular volume (VV), and the variation in gait speed observed in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) before and after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) removal/lumbar drain (LD). Furthermore, it seeks to identify which imaging parameters are the most reliable predictors for significant improvements in gait speed post procedure. Methods In this retrospective analysis, the study measured the gait speed of 35 patients diagnosed with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) before and after they underwent CSF removal. Before lumbar drain (LD), brain images were segmented to calculate the Evans index and ventricular volume. The study explored the relationship between these imaging parameters (the Evans index and ventricular volume) and the improvement in gait speed following CSF removal. Patients were divided into two categories based on the degree of improvement in gait speed, and we compared the imaging parameters between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the optimal imaging parameter thresholds predictive of gait speed enhancement. Finally, the study assessed the predictive accuracy of these thresholds for identifying patients likely to experience improved gait speed post-LD. Results Following CSF removal/lumbar drain, the participants significantly improved in gait speed, as indicated by a paired sample t-test (p-value = 0.0017). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the imaging parameters (EI and VV) and the improvement in gait speed post-LD. Significant differences were detected between the two patient groups regarding EI, VV, and a composite score (statistical test value = 3.1, 2.8, and 2.9, respectively; p-value < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal thresholds for the EI and VV to be 0.39 and 110.78 cm³, respectively. The classification based on these thresholds yielded significant associations between patients displaying favorable imaging parameters and those demonstrating improved gait speed post-LD, with chi-square (χ²) values of 8.5 and 7.1, respectively, and p-values < 0.01. Furthermore, these imaging parameter thresholds had a 74% accuracy rate in predicting patients who would improve post-LD. Conclusion The study demonstrates that ventricle volume and the Evans index can significantly predict gait speed improvement after lumbar drain (LD) in patients with iNPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.