ReviewCureus2024
Association Between Preoperative Cannabis Use and Increased Rate of Revision Surgery Following Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse Impact of Smoking on Spine Fusion and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of cannabis as a method of chronic pain relief has skyrocketed since its legalization in states across the United States. Clinicians currently have a limited scope regarding the effectiveness of marijuana on surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of current cannabis use on the rate of failure of spinal fusions and overall surgical outcomes. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched, identifying studies assessing spinal fusion with reported preoperative cannabis use. Outcomes of interest included reoperation due to fusion failure or pseudoarthrosis with a follow-up time of at least six months. Subgroups of cervical fusions alone and lumbar fusions alone were also analyzed. Certainty in evidence and bias was assessed using the GRADE criteria and ROBINS-I tool (PROSPERO #CRD42023463548). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 788 patients (188 in the cannabis user group and 600 in the non-user group). The rate of revision surgery among cannabis users was higher than that in non-users for all spinal fusions (RR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.67 to 7.66, p = 0.001). For cervical fusions alone, there remained a higher rate of revision surgery for cannabis users compared to non-users (RR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.93 to 10.36, p = 0.0005). For lumbar fusions alone, there was no difference in the rates of revision surgery between cannabis users and non-users (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.28 to 7.73, p = 0.79). Cannabis use was shown to be associated with a higher rate of pseudoarthrosis revisions in spinal fusions on meta-analysis. On subgroup stratification by spine region, cannabis use remained associated with pseudoarthrosis revisions on cervical fusions alone but not lumbar fusions alone. Further research with larger, randomized studies is required to fully elucidate the relationship between cannabis use and fusion, both in general and by spinal region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.